Warner confused by England bowling plans as Thorpe defends selection

England attack comprised five right-arm seamers and Root’s part-time offbreaks

Asked if England should have included either a frontline spinner or a genuine fast bowler like Wood with a point of difference, Thorpe insisted that they had selected a strong attack. “No, I think we picked the right team for this match,” he said. “Actually, I thought that on another day, we could have grazed the edge more and it could have been different on day one.”

“That’s a tactic they have obviously tried to put through to us,” Warner said. “I don’t know why they were doing that. For us, you have to play each ball on its merits. Obviously here [the boundaries are] short square, so you have to back yourself to have a gameplan and stick to that. They mix up their fields as well with different field placements and then from your perspective it’s about how you’re going to adapt to that situation.

“You get into positions where you are almost in one-day mode as well. There are gaps in front of the wicket, [you play] a couple of flat-bat shots. Once you get one or two boundaries away and you start leaking, you have to change tactics. But they didn’t do that. It worked into our plan a bit, and the ball gets softer.

“The length that they bowled here today isn’t hitting the stumps,” he said, comparing conditions to the 2019 series in England when he had struggled against Broad. “That length there is hitting the stumps in England, and that’s the difference. I batted out of my crease and Marnus [Labuschagne] did as well to be able to leave the ball on a good length and we backed ourselves that the ball was going to go over the stumps. That was something that we learned from the Gabba.”

“It unsettles,” Thorpe had insisted earlier. “It gives you an option and a way of attacking. I don’t think you can attack like that all the time due to what it physically takes out of your bowlers. They may all be right-arm bowlers but for me they’ve all got a slightly different style about them as well. We stuck at it well but we didn’t quite get the rub today.

“I don’t think our plans were too bad. If we’d bowled poorly, we would have gone for a lot more throughout the day. It’s not a case of feeling sorry for ourselves when we come in tomorrow again, it’s a case of trying to do very similar things and when it comes to our turn to bat, doing things for a long period of time.

“I think you saw that from the two players today, they did things well for long periods of time, and you can take advantage in the last session at times if you have an attack which is a little bit more tired. It’s very important that we’re able to make some inroads tomorrow.”

While over-rates are likely to remain a problem with a five-man seam attack, Thorpe played down the issue. “I think there’s bigger things going on in the world than over-rates,” he said. “You get through as quick as you can [but] reviews are taking time to get through, sometimes batsmen aren’t ready and minutes get lost throughout the day’s cricket.

“It’s just one of those things in Test cricket. We’d like it to be more perfect but it isn’t. We would have liked some more overs [under floodlights] with a newer ball but it’s challenging at times. Everyone thinks it’s straightforward getting through 80 overs at the perfect time but it isn’t. It’s much harder [because of] temperatures, make-up of your team and the stoppages that go on throughout the day.”